User:Amelialao/Ear drop/Shhamid11 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”? [explain]

Yes the group edits have improved the content of the article, before the edits the article did not contain much information. The content added to the article is relevant and necessary.

Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement? [explain]

The group has completed their goals, they wanted to add types of ear drops, missed dosed, and shelf life. They have been able to add all this information in the article.

Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style?

Yes the edits are consistent with Wikipedia's manual of style, the sources used are neutral and reliable sources.