User:Amir Rafeh/Aniconism

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Are some areas under- or over-developed?
- The topic I chose: Aniconism is shown to be relevant tot he topic, which is about arts representation of the world around us or represent certain people in the religious world. Specifically there are some areas that are both under and overdeveloped. For instance, the topic on Baháʼí Faith in relation to Aniconism has shown to be lacking and underdeveloped.

Is it written neutrally?
- Yes, this topic is written neutrally. Although the topic dives into religion, the information provided is all professorial and does not have any biased views or takes and instead, provides facts and logics

Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable?
- yes, each claim reflects back with citations to other articles, and while has citations next to each claim. Sources cited are shown to be reliable, reflecting on texts such as textbooks.

Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
- This article tackles the coverage of historically underrepresented populations and subjects