User:Amirjeudy/User:Matt Ndirangu/sandbox/Amirjeudy Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Matt Ndirangu


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Matt Ndirangu/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) The lead is not clear, and does not include the following sections in the article. The article is still in its working stages and does not have defined sections
 * 2) The information is relatively unbiased. The is not enough content to fully judge the tone of the article.
 * 3) There is not enough references or information within the article. There is confusion as to what the article is aiming to expand upon or cover.
 * 4) More work needs to be done to fully review the articles content