User:Amna-alh/sandbox

Article Evaluation Notes
Visual Communication Article:


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything that was mentioned in the article was clear, relevant, and understandable. Therefore, there were no distractions because this topic was an interest of mine.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * There are no information out of date because in most sentences there were citations that referred to where they got it from. Other than that, there were many recent edits that still go on today, which makes sense that it is not out of date because it is constantly being updated.
 * What else could be improved?
 * From my point of view, I would have to say there is no need for improvement or add ons. This is because all the information and structure is well flowed and understandable. All details are made clear for the readers to comprehend and gain ideas from. Everything is listed in a pleasing way.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral and there are no claims that show the information being biased. This is because it is all related towards the topic of visual aids. There were pros and cons for each elements discussing on visual communication aspects and models.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No because it is strong and heavy content that is broad. New elements and words keep coming up so there is no space to be repetitive or overrepresented.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * I checked most citations and the links worked and do support the claims of the article relating to visual aids of communication such as photography and film.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Each reference is appropriate because they are all reliable and relevant to the topic. The sources used are considered to be neutral and not biased at all.

Talk Page Evaluation:


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are little to no conversations going on in the talk page. Only good comments are shown, but one person has said that two sections about visual communication should be added to the topic.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

The article is rated as both Start-Class and High-Importance, which signifies the importance or the quality of the article. It is apart of WikiProject graphic designs, media, and systems.


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * There is not much comments on the talk page about this for me to evaluate in detail on this question. However, the article was very clear and precise. From my understanding, it did not have a lot of improvement comments because there weren't any improvements needed.

Creating a Citation
The Fault in Our Stars:

This book needs a better format for readers to actually read. There should be a section for comments, questions, or concerns.

Article Selection
List of Feeding Behaviors:


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic, however, it is not in the best clear and concise format. It needs more detail and improvement.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * This article would not exactly be considered written neutrally because it needs more reliable sources.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Usually citations are needed to be used most often after every sentence to avoid plagiarism. This article only uses two citations when there new information that needs to be cited.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The two sources used are reliable because they are authentic and relevant books/magazines.

Bibliography of Women's Cinema
Some sources need further clarification. The book attached below would help expand more on the topic of women's cinema. It specifies on the true meaning of what women cinema is.

Butler, A. (2005). Women's cinema: The contested screen. London: Wallflower.