User:Ampatterson3/93rd Engineer General Service Regiment/WildKaveMan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ampatterson3


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ampatterson3/93rd Engineer General Service Regiment


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 93rd Engineer General Service Regiment

Evaluate the drafted changes
Ampatterson3's article on the 93rd Engineer General Service Regiment was well organized. The lead at the beginning was a good short summary of what the regiment was. Ampatterson3 then separated the information into two main categories. One was the the history of the regiment and the other was the composed of the units that were within the regiment. under the history section, he could have organized it better due to the significant amount of information he brought up. As for the subordinate unit section, there wasn't any description as to what that section was about. A little description there would allow us to understand what all those groups stands for. Overall, the content seemed to be related to the 93rd regiment and was easy to read. As for the sources, they all seemed to be up to date and working. The picture was also appealing and related to the 93rd regiment. The tone of the article was neutral and it was more informative than persuasive. Ampatterson3's article did a very good job in providing multiple sources and bringing a nonexistent article to life. A little more description on the unit section would help improve the overall understanding of the article.