User:AmritasyaPutra/Useful WP links


 * WP:BIASED While a source may be biased, it may be reliable in the specific context.
 * WP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves.
 * WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV For instance, "John Doe is the best baseball player" expresses an opinion and cannot be asserted in Wikipedia as if it were a fact.
 * WP:YESPOV Avoid stating opinions as facts.
 * WP:STICKTOSOURCE Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source.
 * WP:EXCEPTIONAL Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources.
 * Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion
 * WP:PEACOCK ... legendary, great, acclaimed, visionary, outstanding, leading, celebrated, award-winning, landmark, cutting-edge, extraordinary, brilliant, famous, renowned, remarkable, prestigious, world-class, respected, notable, virtuoso, honorable ...
 * WP:LABEL ... cult, racist, perverted, sect, fundamentalist, heretic, extremist, denialist, terrorist, freedom fighter, bigot, myth, -gate, pseudo-, controversial ...


 * WP:WEASEL ... some people say, many scholars state, it is believed/regarded, many are of the opinion, most feel, experts declare, it is often reported, it is widely thought, research has shown, science says ...
 * WP:ALLEGED ... supposed, apparent, purported, alleged, accused, so-called ...
 * WP:EDITORIALIZING ... notably, interestingly, it should be noted, essentially, actually, clearly, without a doubt, of course, fortunately, happily, unfortunately, tragically, untimely ...
 * WP:CLAIM ... reveal, point out, expose, explain, find, note, observe, insist, speculate, surmise, claim, assert, admit, confess, deny, clarify ...
 * WP:EUPHEMISM ... passed away, gave his life, make love, an issue with, collateral damage, ethnic cleansing, living with cancer, sightless, people with blindness ...
 * WP:IDIOM ... lion's share, tip of the iceberg, gild the lily, take the plunge, ace up the sleeve, bird in the hand, twist of fate, at the end of the day ...
 * WP:FOC Focus on article content during discussions, not on editor conduct; comment on content, not the contributor.
 * WP:WIKIHOUNDING Wikihounding is the singling out of one or more editors, and joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, in order to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work.
 * WP:NOTREQUIRED Wikipedia is a volunteer community and does not require the Wikipedians to give any more time and effort than they wish.
 * WP:FILIBUSTER Removing a large addition for a minor error. If the error is minor, then fix it (or at least tag it for clean-up).
 * WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM Fix problems if you can, flag or remove them if you can't.
 * WP:WONTWORK Libel and material for which no reliable source that supports it has ever been published should be completely removed.
 * WP:LEADPARAGRAPH The first paragraph should define the topic with a neutral point of view, but without being overly specific. It should establish the context in which the topic is being considered by supplying the set of circumstances or facts that surround it.
 * WP:LEADSENTENCE The first sentence should tell the nonspecialist reader what (or who) the subject is.
 * WP:AOTE Making accusations of tendentious editing can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute.
 * WP:REHASH You find yourself repeating the same argument over and over again, without persuading people.
 * WP:CHERRY A common fact picking device is listing great numbers of individual peoples' quotes criticizing the nominal subject, while expending little or no effort mentioning that the criticism comes from a small fraction of people. That small fraction thus gets a soapbox that is far larger than reality warrants.
 * WP:NOTUNANIMOUS Consensus is not the same as unanimity. Every discussion should involve a good faith effort to hear and understand each other.
 * WP:TALKEDABOUTIT Editors may propose a change to current consensus, especially to raise previously unconsidered arguments or circumstances.
 * WP:RSVETTING
 * CAT:ADMINHELP
 * Citation Needed
 * Talk:Islamophobia/Sources