User:Amt1997/Environmental impact of mining/Iheanyiarizor Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Amt1997


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Environmental impact of mining


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmental impact of mining

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

No lead paragraph. Editor makes alternation to certain subheadings.

Content

The additional content is educational and covers some issues that were not addressed in the original article. The information provided seems to be relatively recent and expands on thinly covered subheadings.

Tone and Balance

The draft is neutral generally focusing on the further explanation of topic with the introduction of other topics. The citation and further clarification of relevant material in the sub headings accurately reflect points viewed. However, alternation seem to be thin only providing a minimum amount of information.

Sources and References

Citation were provided for facts are evident at the end of each sentence. New sub heading included recently added citation which are up-to-date.

Organization

The content is inadequately presented as sub headings are created for mining under the erosion heading. Also, there is a lack of content table which is not required so it could be neglected. Moreover, The references were titled inadequately with a subheading title rather than a heading title.

Images and Media

No images were included in the draft.

Talk Page Discussion

The talk page lacks any discussion in relation to article.

Overall Impressions

Generally, Citation of draft is properly done and information lacks grammatical errors or spellings. However, proper use of heading and sub-heading title should be considered.