User:Amulumudi/Courts of South Africa/Literally Legally Blonde Peer Review

General info
Amulumudi
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amulumudi/Courts_of_South_Africa?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Courts of South Africa

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There is nothing in the sandbox yet to peer review. I will do a review of the main page article.

Lead and Opening
The first thing I noticed was the large photograph of the schematic of the African Court system. I think the placement of this is distracting. It should go lower down in the article.

The lead provides a detailed overview of the rest of the article. Maybe make it more concise, but I think it is written well. The tone could be revised a little (e.g. "Despite South Africa's division into nine provinces, the country has a single national court system" makes the tone sound surprised or contradictory).

Content
The Constitution section is full of good content. It could be expanded. I found it brief. Same thing with the Supreme Court of Appeal.