User:Amy YDY/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Guazi

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose Guazi as my article because it is one of my favorite Chinese cuisine and I am familiar with this topic. While the article is totally a "stub" now and only few information were written by other editors, even without any reference. My preliminary impression of it was very short, simple, and incomplete.

Evaluate the article
Lead section:

The lead includes a clear and concise introductory sentence to descirbe the article's topic; The lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections; However, the lead includes information that is not present in the article, which is about the places of production. The lead is too concise and short.

Content:

This article has a very imcomplete content with only bullet points listed though relevant to the topic. The content was last edited on 9 December 2020, which is up-to-date. The article misses content about the description of productio places, which is introduced in the lead section. Also many aspects of Guazi are not included in this article, like its function, edible methods, history, custome, nutritional ingredient, etc. The content of this article does not deal with one of Wikepedia's equity gaps, either not address historically underrepresented topics. However, it involves a topic about culture of cuisine in some typical places around the world.

Tone and Balance:

The article is generally neutral, without claims or contents that appear biased toward a particular position. However, there is one viewpoint appear overrepresented when the article said "It is a popular snack in China, Malaysia and overseas Chinese communities, especially in Indonesia". Different perspective may occur toward that point. Some minority viewpoints are accurately presented like the varieties of Guazi but without detailed descriptions. The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References:

The article does not cite any reference in the page.

Organization and writing quality:

The contents on the article are concise, clear, and easy to read. But the article has several grammatical errors. Since the contents are largely deficient, I can not evaluate the organization and strutures.

Images and Media:

The article includes an image that enhance understanding the topic, which is appropriate and well-captioned. The image does not adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations bacause it lacks reference. The image is laid out in a visually appealing way.

Talk Page discussion:

There's no conversation on this talk page. This article is rated as a stub related to Chinese cuisine and is not a part of any WikiProjects.

Overall impressions:

The article's overall status are stub with only introductional information covered. The article's strengths are its image selction and easy-reading contents. The article can be improved by describing more aspects of Guazi as different sections like the function, edible methods, history, custome, and nutritional ingredient. The article can be added with more images to improve learning the topic. I would say the article is underdeveloped.