User:Amy YDY/Lusheng/Zzzzzjessica Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Amy YDY


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Amy YDY/Lusheng


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lusheng

Lead
My peer has been updated the Lead to reflect the content, and it includes an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic, and also includes a brief description of the article's major sections. The Lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The Lead is concise.

Content
The content added is relevant to the topic and is also up-to-date. The content does not miss any content. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. It does not address topics related to historically underreoresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance
The content added by my peer is neutral. There are no claims that appear too heavily biased toward a particular position. There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References
The new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. The content accurately reflect what the cited sources say. The sources are thorough. The sources are current. The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors. Some of the sources my peer used are peer-reviewed. The link works. But most of the sources added by my peer are Chinese sources, it may be better to add some English sources.

Organization
The content added is concise and clear. The content added by my peer does not have any grammatical or spelling errors, and the content is well-organized.

Images and Media
My peer added two images related to the topic. The images added by my peer help to understand the structure of the instrument. The images are well-captioned.

Overall Impression
The content added by my peer has improved the overall quality of the article, it becomes more completed.