User:Amy maurad25/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Distal Promoter

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose to evaluate the article since it is a subject very close to information I have learned while in biochemistry. This subject matters since it is important to consider its relevance upon DNA transcription and its connection to the RNA polymerase. My preliminary impression of the article was that it lacked a sufficient amount of background information and lacked to dive deeper into a specific example of a distal promoter.

Evaluatee
(Compose a detaThis iled evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article originally contains an introductory sentence that does clearly describes the article's topic. However, since there are no major sections after the leading statement, there is no way of knowing where the article might dive into further.

The article lacks a talk page discussion and lacks major information that can be included in regard to distal promoter regulation or uses in specific pathways or genomes. The article's overall status is very low and needs lots of additional writing to be used at a higher level.

In the talk page discussion, there should be conversations on how to further expand the distal promoter in a format that is clear and understandable and flows in the right direction. It is important to add information on to another in a concise manner that flows in language.