User:Amyrica19/Elizabeth Coleman White/CollegeStudentForGrade Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Amyrica19's Elizabeth Coleman White
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Elizabeth Coleman White's Blueberry Cultivation Section

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? yes

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No, two of the sources is biased. Author; Levins, y (2018-07-04). "Elizabeth Coleman White: Blueberry Queen of the Jersey Pines". can not be used. https://www.nj.gov/state/historical/it-happened-here/ihhnj-er-blueberries.pdf is a classroom activity
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? no
 * Are the sources current? Yes, sources were between 2014 and 2018
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No each source only has one author
 * Check a few links. Do they work? All three links worked

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, did not add an image
 * Are images well-captioned? Did not add an image
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Did not add an image
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Did not add an image

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, Blue berries from the research I've done Elizabeth Coleman White was well-know for her blue berries
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The links and the newly added section, greatly improved the article of Elizabeth Coleman White.
 * How can the content added be improved? Grammar should be improved

Overall evaluation
Amyrica19's added section of Blueberry Cultivation elevated Elizabeth Coleman White's article. What Amyrica19 written was already in the original lead by another writer to which they did not have to update it. The content added was relevant, up-to-date, and Elizabeth Coleman White is related to historically underrepresented populations. Amyrica19's content is neutral and did not persuade readers to feel anything other than to inform. All three reference links worked, but two out of the three are not reliable secondary sources. Author; Levins, y (2018-07-04). "Elizabeth Coleman White: Blueberry Queen of the Jersey Pines" is biased towards Elizabeth Coleman White while https://www.nj.gov/state/historical/it-happened-here/ihhnj-er-blueberries.pdf is a class activity. All of the sources are current, written between 2014 and 2018. The content was concise, well structured but had grammatical errors. Amyrica19 did not add a picture to their content.