User:Amyxlam/Booker Site/Huong N Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Amyxlam
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Amyxlam/Booker Site

Lead

 * The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content added.
 * The Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * The Lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * The Lead does not include information that is not present in the article.
 * The Lead is concise.

Content

 * The content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date.
 * No content that is missing or does not belong.

Tone and Balance

 * The content added is neutral.
 * There is no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * The excavation methods is over-represented.
 * The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
 * The sources is current. However, author need to hyperlink the source.
 * Links inside content work.

Organization

 * The content added is well-written. It is concise, clear, and easy to read.
 * The content added does not have many grammatical and spelling errors.
 * The Lead content can be separated at "These sites manufactured..." to better represent different main points.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * The article does not meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements, materials taken from the source should be numbered marked with the appropriate reference.
 * There is one of sources but it accurately represents the basic literature on the subject.
 * The article is linked to other articles so it is more discoverable.

Overall impressions

 * The content added has improved the overall quality of the article.
 * One of the article strength is the introduction/lead, it is very complete and presents major information about the site.
 * How can the content added be improved? Site background and significant of the find can be added.

Overall evaluation
- The introductory section is very well written.