User:AnOddName/Snippets


 * I use the following for commenting, talk page tagging, edit summaries, and whatever else needs a quick response. Take and edit them for your own uses if you find them helpful!

Article--~

warning for Article revision 7777, using

Article

welcome and warning for Article revisions, using

archive discussions to Talk:Article/Archive N. A list of archives is given at the end of the talkheader

Featured article candidates

 * Made for use at Featured article candidates.

Technical comments --~
 * No dab links or dead external links, and all images have alt text with no obvious errors.
 * Ref dates are consistent ISO style.

Refs mix ISO-style (YYYY-MM-DD), Day Month Year, and even a few Month Day, Year dates. Use one for all of them. I suggest either (the most common in this article's refs) or  (MDY is used more in the US than other countries). --~

Editor, do you have any thoughts on the article, its sources, etc.? Featuring an article takes consensus, not simple votes—if Raul654 or someone else decided they should review or un-feature this article and wonder why you supported it, what would you tell them? --~

Not yet. Though New Cutie Honey has what I consider my best Wikipedia work, it still has long term issues. There may still be some stuff from the Perfect Guides I can add, but I think only interviews and other fan-oriented stuff remain; if you think the article is already comprehensive without more of that and you can address all of the to do list issues, you are clear and can consider me a co-nominator. --~

Peer review
peer review: blahblah

You should consider finding a copyeditor even after the review, especially before going to FA (but ideally even before GA so that it can sail through). There is no deadline for Wikipedia, or for its articles' quality, so prepare as much as possible. (See also debugging.)
 * You should only close if there's a flood of other edits that's keeping the article unstable. In that case, keep it far from the GAN list (see criterion 5).  --~