User:AnaFlorescu/Bi4I4/Jdk22 Peer Review

General info
AnaFlorescu
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AnaFlorescu/Bi4I4
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - Looks good to me, short and to the point while still mentioning the overarching categories that the page will cover.

Content - Content is relevant and up to date.

Tone/Balance - Tone is fine and doesn't take a stance.

Sources - Sources seem relevant and up to date. However, in the Bismuth subhalide section you mention a Bruck(2003) where I think you either meant Ruck or Bruce based on the nearby references. If you feel the need for more sources it looks like there is some recent Bismuth redox catalysis papers that I found after a quick google search. But you have plenty of reactivity content already.

Organization - I think that you could shorten the names of almost all of the Organometallic subsections to be a little bit more clear about the topics, we already know from the main header for the section that you are writing about organometallic bismuth compounds. In terms of quick grammar things/misspelled words, I think dissipationless is misspelled in paragraph 2. Similarly, physicochemical is misspelled in the structure of beta-Bi4I4 section and the synthesis of Bi4I4 says "a A temperature gradient" (if this is an actual thing, then my bad but use "an"). I also think the last sentence of the DFT section could use a little bit more explanation, because all of the orbitals should be in the band structure, so I assume you meant to say the valence bands around the fermi level or around those special points at a particular energy. Also, For the Me-Bi sigma bond compounds, did you mean to have Me or just M, because Me seems to imply methyl groups? The first sentence in the transition metal carbonyl complex section is a little clunky and tripped me up as I was reading. In the same section, the sentence that begins with "The reaction yields..." is also missing an "a" before the homonuclear. For the dibismuth clusters with TM section, clusters is misspelled in the first sentence and the end of that first paragraph is a little unclear as to which element is donating with its pi bond. In the Bismuth containing clusters section you have a figure for a Fe/Bi cluster with bridging COs but I dont think you mention it in the text at all, just the cobalt one.

Those should all be minor changes, but I am also a little bit more concerned about the solid state section, because there is a lot of Bismuth solid state phases (e.g. MnBi2) but you only really talk about Bismuth halides. You might want to think about renaming that section to more accurately reflect what all is there.

Images - The images look good and are well captioned. There is the one out of place cluster mentioned above and you could potentially play with the spacing of the figures to simplify everything a little bit because you have a lot of them.

Overall - This meets notability requirements and is well cited. You should maybe link to the organobismuth wiki page. The overall quality is good and you do a really good job of clearly getting through a lot of complex clusters and their reactivity.