User:AnaHelge/Gymshark/Wikistudent2002 Peer Review

Lead


 * Lead has not been updated to reflect the new content added
 * The lead does include a good introductory sentence, but it can be improved to add more about what the article is about
 * The lead doesn't include a brief description of the article's major sections
 * The lead doesn't present information that is not presented in the article
 * The lead is concise and easy to read
 * I didn't realize we had to add so much to the lead either :)

Content


 * The content added is relevant to the topic
 * I like how the content added is so unique to Gymshark
 * The content appears to be up to date, it's good that you included such recent news
 * The article does deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps because it does address topic topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics, with the commitment to diversity section

Tone and Balance


 * The content added appears to be neutral
 * No claims appear heavily biased
 * There is no negative reviews or mention of competitors of the Gymshark, which could make it more balanced
 * The content added doesn't seem to appear to be intended to persuade

Sources and References


 * The new content all appears to be backed up by sources
 * Links work
 * Sources are current
 * Sources are from a diverse spectrum of authors
 * May be better sources available, especially about competitors or negative things about the brand

Organization


 * The content added is well written, it's concise, easy to read, and clear
 * The break down of the content could be reorganized to flow more from start to finish, such as more paragraph breaks or bullets

Images and Media


 * There is one picture of Gymshark headquarters and the Gymshark logo (IDK if this counts as a picture)
 * A picture would be nice of Gymshark products or community involvement
 * The image adheres to copyright regulations
 * The image is laid out in an appealing way

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)