User:AnabelleMR/Social anxiety/Ricardo.rivera7 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? AnabelleMR
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Social anxiety

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? All the information added by the editor is relevant to the topic

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, this is always important when an editor is about to edit.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, I check all of the links and all of them are working

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No, at first it starts talking in general, as it should, but then the writer chooses to speak to the first person using words like "you" when it should be written as "the"
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes, I recommend her to use grammarly to check spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Somewhat yes. At first everything comes together but in the part of "signs and symptoms" there is a sentence that starts with "Three types of ...", and from there on the topics do not concord. There needs to be something in between those sentences to unite the message.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The article doesn’t have any images, she can improve that part.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? When she adds the images, she has to make sure to laid the images in an appealing form.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? All of the information added is always good in the improvement of an article
 * What are the strengths of the content added? yes because it makes the reader understand what are the symptoms to look for.
 * How can the content added be improved? The "signs and symptoms" part could be improved by going in depth a little more and even giving examples of what to look for in people who suffer it.