User:Ananya.srivatsan/Kcore142/Pesticide Incidents in the San Joquain Valley/Ananya.srivatsan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kcore142


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kcore142/Pesticide Incidents in the San Joaquin Valley
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Kcore142/Pesticide Incidents in the San Joaquin Valley

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is very descriptive that has a specific location to focus on the Central Valley. Defining their issue is a great way to grasp the audience's attention. It serves as a good introduction to the rest of the article and major sections of background, effects and responses, and pesticide controversies. The lead is pretty concise as it only provides a definition. The content of the topic is relevant and up-to-date because the sources being used are like that. No opinions are expressed in the article and it is solely factual. This means that there is no bias toward perspectives in the article, therefore the article has a balanced tone. Dividing their article into different sections allows for an organized reading. I would like to see more details with the case study because it was solely introduced, but can be expanded on.