User:Ancicco/Elizabeth O. King/Gamoch Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ancicco


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ancicco/Elizabeth O. King
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Elizabeth O. King

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * everything in the article is relevant to the article topic
 * nothing distracted me; everything was well organized
 * the article showed no bias (that I noticed) and was written neutrally
 * the viewpoints were fairly represented
 * There were plenty of citations to support the information provided and the links worked
 * the references used seem appropriate and reliable
 * the information is as up to date as possible (2021 published articles were used) and nothing seems to be missing
 * nice use of sections and subsections