User:Anderson268/Compartmentalization (psychology)/Hollyb98 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Anderson268


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Anderson268/Compartmentalization


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Compartmentalization (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead paragraph does a great job of defining the topic as well as outlining the topics within the article. It does not seem that the additional information added is essential to the lead paragraph. There are some topics mentioned that are not mentioned in the body of the article such as dissociation and moral views and how they play into compartmentalizing. In the psychoanalytic view heading there is no citation in the second section which may need to be added. There does however seem to be the most discussion in under that heading. It seems balanced and unbiased toward any specific belief throughout the article. The addition to the vulnerability section of the article seems to improve the current article and leads to further insight of the topic. The addition seems well balanced, clear and concise. It helps connect the larger idea of the article to how vulnerability is innate to this behavior-- something that was initially not obvious of. I am probably most interested in the development of the section under social identity. This seems to the most obvious display of compartmentalization in day to day life. I would look into the origin of the saying "two-faced" and seeing if it has any context to this topic. There may be more research on grief and compartmentalization. A section to perhaps add to the article may be the comorbidity between different disorders and the tendency to compartmentalize such as: anxiety, depression, ptsd, etc. It would be interesting to see the affects of PTSD on compartmentalization and whether it increases with traumatic experiences. The sources are thin which may be due to the lack of content in the original article. However, it could use some additional citing for a few points. this will be helped by adding the sources that the page is obviously missing as mentioned above and maybe finding sources that echo the already stated facts. I would be interested to see the last chart and how this article fits into a larger idea that is defence mechanisms.