User:AndreaFox/Archivio

2 accounts
Just curious. Why do ya have 2 accounts? GoodDay (talk) 16:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I luv spaghetti, but I'm not Italian. GoodDay (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

No prob. GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Collaborazione
Per una valida collaborazione agli articoli riguardo la storia di Dalmazia e Istria ossia foibe massacres, Istrian exodus, history of Dalmatia, Dalmatian Italian, ecc. puoi contattare gl'italiani user:Il palazzo, user:Nickel Chromo, user:Attilios e user:Emanuele Mastrangelo attivi pure su it.wiki, ma Mastrangelo è lì ancora bloccato, penso a causa di un malinteso. Per l'articolo sul dittatore Broz puoi contattare l'australiano user:Sir Floyd attaccato dal solito DIREKTOR. Se puoi, lascia un messaggio in user talk:Jimbo Wales per un appello finalizzato a sbloccare user:Luigi 28, user:Barba Nane, user:Ducatista2, user:Miranovic, user:Trusciante, user:Pantaleone, user:Vastaso che son stati messi al bando su istigazione delle famigerate utenze slave che hai già segnalato come problematiche: difatti agiscono una in sostegno dell'altra contro il regolamento che definisce questo comportamento meatpuppetry sanzionabile con la messa al bando. Considera inoltre che DIREKTOR ha ricevuto 3 blocchi per guerre editoriali e fu ristretto ossia limitato in una serie di articoli nei quali insiste con il suo POV: leggi qui Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia dunque se lo bloccano ancora una volta è prossimo alla messa al bando. Questi slavi negano la pulizia etnica contro i cittadini italiani ordinata dal dittatore Broz e di conseguenza vogliono fare qui pulizia istigando gli amministratori contro utenze italiane e non che si oppongono alla loro agenda politica, che è pure sanzionabile con messa al bando. Per avere un'idea guarda qui e successivi interventi, poi qui con successivi interventi; ancora leggi qui con l'ennesima guerra editoriale prima e dopo questa modifica; posso continuare con altri articoli nei quali DIREKTOR nega la pulizia etnica fatta dai croati nella guerra interslava dopo il 1991 e attacca utenze serbe: insomma è inaccettabile questo schifo! --Mengardo (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I want to make it clear: I will not answer to messages not in english. I want all the other users to be able to understand my discussions. Besides i will not answer to any request from meatpuppers. Thanks --AndreaFox (talk) 20:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Andreafox. Thanks for your input on the Tito talk page.Sir Floyd (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * You ask why? I needed more support of at least of two or more Editors on putting in the Encyclopaedia Britannica/BBC-History encyclopedic statements. Thanks Sir Floyd (talk) 23:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Encyclopaedia Britannica/BBC-History
Just added Encyclopaedia Britannica/BBC-History statements to the Tito article. Thank you for your support. Sir Floyd (talk) 23:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Seasonal Greetings AndreaFox2! I think you made a very important point on the Tito talk page. I believe if we are going to make any progress on the Tito article, all the ediors should behave as best as they can according to Etiquette. One of the things that happen when uncivil behaviour occurrs, it ceases to be about editorial work. I find it personally hard to work in such a environment. Anyway I'm of to work hope you have a good Xmas. Ps Do you think "Encyclopaedia Britannica/BBC" are cheery picking? Sir Floyd (talk) 00:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:Re
We seem to have missed all the action! Anyhow, I'm taking a long break from the Tito page. Regards Sir Floyd (talk) 02:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi! I must apologize for not contributing to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You see I don’t feel confident enough to contribute to such a forum, yet. Sometime in the future I would gladly do so, as then I’ll have more mileage, expertise and maybe even respect from the Wiki-Communatiy. As a newbie I used to get into trouble and through the kindness of some editors, things worked out (I agreed not to contribute to the Tito page for a month). On a positive note Direktor did apologize and that’s good. Let's see how things work out from here. This of course doesn’t stop us from doing research on more “Contemporary References” concerning issues that are of interest. We can create our own study-notes on References-Sandbox. I think that’s allowed. Regards Sir Floyd (talk) 01:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Please help with this user DIREKTOR
This use DIREKTOR and his friends, revert and put only a nationalistic info, he is a very danger people in wikipedia, now he put me on suck investigation.. for me is a surprise.. i read on the web than this persons are very dangers and made banned all the people who not think in your way.. mljet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mljet (talk • contribs) 16:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

If there's editors hanging around those articles whose conducts are similiar to Imbris? Then those articles (and talkpages) needs permanent semi-protection. GoodDay (talk) 17:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's for ya'll to determine. Anyways, semi-protection will help at those articles. GoodDay (talk) 17:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Toyonobori
A tag has been placed on Toyonobori requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Oo7565 (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Blue Demon
The move of Blue Demon is totally and utterly wrong! he has been referred to as Blue Demon more than anything, billed as such with the "demonio azul" being more of a nickname. The move needs to be undone.  MPJ  -DK 16:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * yes thank you for assuming I'm clueless about what "Demonio Azul" means. He was billed and is referred to everywhere as "Blue Demon", books, posters and articles in Spanish generally list him as "Blue Demon". So the spanish version of his name is a nickname, his billed name is "Blue Demon".  MPJ  -DK 16:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * So that's your reasoning? it's called "Leyenda de Azul" so that's your reasoning? I know quite a bit about Lucha Libre, I own several books about the history of Lucha Libre - where he's referred to as "Blue Demon", no other names are translated to English in these books, why would he be the exception? Why would he consistently be the exception? Why is Blue Demon, Jr. constantly referred to as Blue Demon, Jr. on spanish language lucha sites such as www.superluchas.net? I can name you book after book, site after site, article after article where they're "Blue Demon", your argument is "why is it called "Leyenda de Azul"? "Leyenda de Plata" is in Santo's honor, not his name.  MPJ  -DK 16:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

So you ignore me when I say books, sites and articles I refer to are in spanish? Googleing the site "www.superluchas.net" (100% in spanish) for the term "Demonio Azul" gives 287 hits. Googling for "Blue Demon" gives approximately 11000, that's event THOUNSAND hits. I'm the biggest contributor to Lucha Libre articles here on WIkipedia, I know the subject, I've done extensive research in this stuff. So please don't just say "oh he's Mexican so naturally it's Demonio Azul", provide facts - provide something that can refute the factor 500+ more mentions of "Blue Demon" on a Lucha Libre news site.  MPJ  -DK 16:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

http://superluchas.net/ can't be considered a sure source. In its main page (these are examples) it lists superloco as supercrazy and rey misterio as rey mysterio and it seems more focused on wwe than mexico itself. You seems to ignore i ask you to list those sites, ... --AndreaFox2 (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)


 * If you don't understand the "Leyenda de Plata" reference then clearly you're talking about a subject you do not actually know . The Leyenda de Plata tournament is a tournament in honor of El Santo, the "Leyenda de Azul" tournament was patterened on the "Plata" tournament both in format and name. El Santo's name did not have "plata" in it, his nickname did. You want books? I guess the website wasn't enough eh? the factor 500 difference? SuperLuchas is a reliable source, they're the website of the SuperLuchas magazine complete with an editorial process that makes it a reliable source. The comments about "Superloco" and "Rey Misterio" are just pathetic, you don't know the subject - Rey Misterio, Jr. is currently billed as "Rey Mysterio" so naturally they write it like that, and Super Crazy is actually his name so why the hell would they not write it like that? THis is pathetic, I am going to request that they be moved back. MPJ  -DK 17:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

THe movie he starred in can be called what it wants, he's actually referred to as Blue Demon in the text. I never said he was Never billed as "Demonio Azul", but that he's primarily billed as "Blue Demon" (overwhelmingly so). Use your own google link and search for "Demonio Azul" and Lucha, then search for "Blue Demon" and Lucha - Google.es says Azul = 3120 Demon= 74600, approximately 24 times more. And "Leyenda de Plata" from Santo's nickname, Leyenda de Azul from Demon's nickname - sorry if that's confusing you.  MPJ  -DK 17:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

You're right "pathetic" is a wrong word, your argument was "invalid", "misunderstood", "wrong" - in so much as "Rey Mysterio" and "Super Crazy" are how they are actually billed by the companies they work for and should be mentioned as such. And if it didn't matter why move it at all? I'm sorry but that's an argument? You move it then go "oh it's no big deal". if that's the case - we'll just have it moved back no problemo.  MPJ  -DK 17:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Misleading? You searched for all pages containing "Demonio", "Azul" and "Lucha" in any combination, I searched for those that actually said "Demonio Azul", big difference especially since both Lucha (fight) and Azul are pretty common words. I mean you search for "Super" and "Man" or search for "Superman" you get different results. So yes a lot of pages say "Blue", "Demon" and "Fight" in SPanish somewhere on them - very few actually say his actual name. Sorry but you're the one that's either misleading or not aware of the search syntax on sites like Google.  MPJ  -DK 17:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Last comment and I post the move requests - check out WP:COMMONNAME, Wikipedia rules on naming articles, it states "Articles are normally titled using the most common English-language name of the subject of the article."  MPJ  -DK 17:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Demonio Azul.  MPJ  -DK 17:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Btw - that book source you cite - http://books.google.es/books?id=Xbcha3h18lcC&pg=PT163&lpg=PT163&dq=demonio+azul+luchador&source=bl&ots=FQHGmEWHXy&sig=zI_hUq5OEScWjiLWUgjZGEvZKG8&hl=it&ei=Qf9qS822G9KnsQbtm82EBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CCcQ6AEwBw#v=snippet&q=Demonio%20Azul&f=false right? Demonio Azul - 5 hits, Blue Demon 27 hits, even your proof doesn't prove your point I'm sorry to inform you.  MPJ  -DK 18:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi AndreaFox2, Blue Demon is the correct name. You can check it out in the Blue Demon Jr. official page http://www.bluedemonjr.com/inicio.html.--Cesarth15 (talk) 21:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

World Wrestling Association (Los Angeles)
Hi! I recently noticed your edits to World Wrestling Association (Los Angeles) and related subjects. I took it upon myself to copy-edit your contributions in order to meet Wikipedia's as well as the professional wrestling Wikiproject's minimum quality standards. Here is a brief summary of the changes.


 * WWA (Los Angeles) World heavyweight Championship was merged with the more dated WWA World Heavyweight Championship (Los Angeles) article in order to preserve the latter's edit history.


 * Due to lack of reliable sources, post-1968 championship reigns were removed. The current source suggests that the title was retired in 1968. If a another championship has emerged in recent history using the WWA name while also claiming the history of the Los Angeles-based WWA World Heavyweight Championship, legal proof showing that such new WWA title can claim such history must be presented. This is required in order to avoid copyright infringement.


 * The "Legacy" section in the article, World Wrestling Association (Los Angeles), was removed due to lack of sources. For more information on citing sources within articles, see Citing sources

Thank you for your time. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 04:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Inform
I inform you: read user talk:Jimbo Wales —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.126.34 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi!
Good to see you back Andrea Fox2 :) I've got another contemporary one:
 * Have you read this: European Union/Commission's document European Public Hearing on "Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes” Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (January–June 2008) and the European Commission. It is very interesting. See Ya!
 * Communist Retaliation and Persecution on Yugoslav Territory During and After WW2. Dr. Ph. Michael Portmann The text represents a summary of a master thesis referring to the above-mentioned topic written and accepted at Vienna University in 2002. Sir Floyd (talk) 01:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

You won a revert as the milionth user who hopefully try to improve the page
Nice to know you mister Fox. I'm sorry to see someone had already rollbacked a good edit of yours. Regards, --Theirrulez (talk) 05:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Honey the cat
Hello Mr AndreaFox2, I have just noticed that your very good article on Honey the cat has been deleted. I think this is outrageous. Honey is of the greatest importance in the modern world. I would like to start a campaign to reintroduce the article, which we could maybe, if you have time expand together to bring it maybe to GA or even FA status. What do you think? I really think it's a shame that your hard work here has been reduced to dust. Please let me know how we should proceed, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 19:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Please be aware that I am in deadly earnest. Now, as I bow humbly to your superior and, if I may say, detailed knowledge of the Honey the cat universe, please let me know how we should proceed in our Honey resurrection campaign. Thanks, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 19:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * So you're not interested in bringing Honey back from the grave? AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 21:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * How could it be annoying? For what do I have to apologise? AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 21:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lee Wang Pyo


The article Lee Wang Pyo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE as he hasn't competed in a top promotion. Also doesn't meet WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   00:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Bosnian Crisis
I undid your two edits regarding Italy's price for acquiesence to the annexation for reasons mentioned in the descriptive title. If you want to add footnoted material regarding Italy's position I can suggest Albertini as a reliable source. As I recall, Italy's bottom line was that an Italian University be built in Austria-Hungary's Italian speaking region. I think there is a "scrap of paper" quote that might be good.Werchovsky (talk) 23:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

First, let me say I agree that something should be said about Italy's demands for compensations.

What you have written this time is better and better placed but still not quite right. You seem to be saying that Austria-Hungary's actions in 1909 violated the 1912 version of the Triple Alliance Treaty. You did not give page citations and volume number, and I am not sure why you are citing the original Italian edition of Albertini instead of the English edition which will be easier for most people to check who use this English article. Contractions should only be used when they are direct quotations. That is what I meant by not encyclopedic. The contraction is still there. Finally, did you really read Albertini's extremely detailed material dealing with the annexation crisis? As I said above, I believe it was Tittoni who told Aehrenthal during the crisis that if Italy did not receive as compensation a commitment By Austria-Hungary to create an Italian University the Triplice would become nothing more than a "scrap of paper" or words to that effect. If you don't want to dig through the hundreds of pages in Albertini regarding this crisis to find Italy's bottom line demands then when I have more time I will do so. Finally, I think the way you have tied the annexation crisis to Italy's decision to attack Austria-Hungary in 1915 is not quite right. There is something to say and I think it relates to the scrap of paper quotation, specifically, that a treaty signed by a democratic country like Italy, if not backed by popular opinion, becomes worthless and Austria-Hungary's decision not to build an Italian University as compensation to Italy left Italy with nearly empty hands and created public ill-will that made it more likely that Italy would not stand by her allies.Werchovsky (talk) 16:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

IF you edit poorly, as you have, you degrade the article, even if the subject matter you write about has some relevance. When you cite, you must cite volume number and pages. The English version of Albertini is already cited heavily in the article, unless the English version is poorly translated on the sections in question, then I think it is better if you keep citing the English version. You say you are knowledgeable of these events and at the same time ignorant of the Italian University negotations implying it did not happen and further you imply you read Albertini on the annexation. It makes no sense since the title of Albertini, Volume 1, Chapter IV, Section 11 is "...an Italian University in Austria." (The actual discussion of the University begins in section 9.) When you cite, be sure to put the footnote immediately after the punctuation, not before. Do not use contractions when editing except when making a direct quotation. Austria-Hungary was not occupying new lands, rather, it was giving up one piece of land and annexing another that it already occupied under a long standing mandate, so territorial transfer from Austria to Italy were not at all realistic expectations during this crisis. IF, on the other hand, Austria-Hungary had attacked Serbia and taken territory, then the section of the Triple Alliance you refer to could justly be called into effect.Werchovsky (talk) 06:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

I read your 8 edits to my talk page including the one accusing me of being "a bit too rude". I really was hoping you would understand what I was trying to convey regarding how to make page citations, the proper way of writing an historical article on Wikipedia, the content in question, and so on, and that you would go on to run a grammar check and fix what you had written and blend it into the article properly (I looked at your edits on some other articles and found you also had not made proper page citations). Instead, you have taken my comments as a personal attack. Part of the problem may be a language barrier. For example I wrote "You say you are ... ignorant of the Italian University negotiations." You seemed to have taken this as me accusing you of being ignorant, which was not the meaning at all. It just meant you said you didn't know about the negotiations but they really did happen. I thought you might not know that contractions should not be used in this kind of article and when I explained it to you you would make at least that one simple correction, but you did not, so now I am hoping that you are just not familiar with the word "contraction". When I have some free hours to reread the diplomatic history I will write a clear description of the diplomatic correspondence between Austria-Hungary and Italy and possibly Germany and Italy as regards to Italian requests for compensation made by Tittoni. But the object of my edit will not be to justify Italy attacking Austria-Hungary in 1915, it will just be a simple telling of the diplomacy within the Triplice regarding Italian interests in the annexation during 1908-9.Werchovsky (talk) 01:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

support
I can support you for neutral version of Josip Broz Tito because POV pusher DIREKTOR removed your valid edits: in fact DIREKTOR yesterday was topic banned on all Yugoslavia related articles for one mounth! You can restore your old many links and sources so later I will support you in case of POV editor's attack. Read user talk:DIREKTOR and this ban. Ciao,--Mat003second (talk) 09:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

just 2 links: Sockpuppet investigations/DIREKTOR/Archive and User talk:Jimbo Wales; DIREKTOR and PRODUCER are sure socks but they ban Mat003second: lies and propaganda always!--MILAZERO (talk) 15:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Read
Read here--Mengardo (talk) 13:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

activist
you warned but professional activist DIREKTOR removed all sources which report several crimes of dictator Broz Tito in all related articles such as Bleiburg massacre, foibe massacres and Croatization: that guy was blocked 9 times for edit warring and he was 2 topic bans! You can intervene in Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.126.34 (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

CM Punk
No prob. Flipping through your edit history it was plain to see no harm was meant by it. Appreciate you updating, thanks! Papacha (talk) 23:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Osamu Kido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Ciao andreafox, ho apportato delle modifiche alla pagine inglese della Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore e volevo chiederti se potevi controllare la presenza di eventuali errori grammaticali. grazie mille. bye--Cormeo (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Don't write here anymore, thanks!
Please don't add here messages, i won't answer. Goodbye!