User:Andreamorar/Feminism and equality/Obeyjassi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(andreamorar)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Andreamorar/Feminism_and_equality?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Feminism and equality

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

 * There is no lead or edits to the lead.

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * The article is feminism and equality is a part of Wikipedia's equity gaps. This article is short so additional information with secondary sources would help remove this article from being a part of Wiki's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance[edit]

 * Is the content added neutral?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Are the sources current?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * There is no content in their sandbox. N/A. If you did add content into your sandbox, make sure you publish the changes so it can be seen by myself and our professor.