User:AndrewHeits/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Environmental communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose Environmental communication due to the importance it has to the communities and environments that become impacted due to a lack of communication from big companies involved in producing pollution. This subject is important due to the serious nature mistakes have on the planet and its suitability. My initial impression was the article was very brief but provided a decent amount of information over the field of study.

Evaluate the article
The lead of the article was very informative, but did not provide an overview of the whole article. It provided a good explanation on what environmental communication is, but it was not too long or drawn out. The content overall was very detailed and provided a large amount of information with a minimum amount of wasted text. Some of the sources he used should be more up to date and the article had a sign saying he needed better citations for some sections. (Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. He has a very diverse list of authors which helps provide credibility. There are only two images and both have a good description and appear to be following Wikipedia's guidelines. The talk page was only used to make an update on the article so there was not much there to analyze. Overall, I feel as if the author would update his sources and provided more information on the outlook of the academic discipline it would be much better.