User:AndrewPpohl/3D printing/Carariney Peer Review

General info
AndrewPpohl
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:3D printing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):3D printing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is very well written. It gives a great overview of what the entire article will be about. It is a fine balance of condensed yet complex information. The content appears to be relevant and up to date with the topic. The history behind 3D printing appears to be accurate. Terms that users may be unfamiliar with are provided with definitions through the inclusion of other article links. The author includes images that serve to give readers a better visual and overview of the 3D printing process as well as what 3D printing creates. There are a vast number of resources used which incorporate different perspectives from many individuals. I think this article overall does a great job of addressing the history, process, and impact of 3D printing.