User:AndrewPpohl/3D printing/Lshersh Peer Review

General info
AndrewPpohl
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AndrewPpohl/3D_printing?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 3D printing
 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? YES but I don't know if if that talking about 4D is the most logical in since that might be a whole different as you talked about. I would steer away from talking about that
 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes. Application page needs a link
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they work
 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? I would start talking in not bullet point form and actually start making paragraphs.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes very clear. Where would you but the application page?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes very clear. Where would you but the application page?

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)