User:AndrewRow1/Mutansucrase/Ethanstryker Peer Review

General info
Andrew Row
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AndrewRow1/Mutansucrase
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: lead is well written and tells me exactly what Mutansucrase is in the first sentence. The authors could give a brief overview of the sections and examples that will be addressed in the article. The lead is concise and does not give a lot of detail. The rest of the article goes into more depth of what was mentioned in the lead.

I am not well versed in this topic but reading through everything seems to match up with each other. There is not wrong information to my knowledge of what is being explained. The tones and balances are fine, this is a topic that doesn't really have information that is argumentative or require to address an unrepresented population.

There are no images which could be good to add, there is a figure with hyperlinks leading you to various websites that explain in more depth on certain topics which is a good touch. A majority of the references are older than 10 years ago. Another reference or two within the last 5 years would make the article more up date