User:AndrewRow1/Mutansucrase/Malaypayne Peer Review

General info
AndrewRow1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AndrewRow1/Mutansucrase
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
In your lead, perhaps provide a sentence explaining why mutansucrase matters. You do a great job describing how it works, maybe try and explain why should I care about it. You can also add a sentence or so addressing each major subtopic below (for example, inhibitors).

Content, Tone and Balance seem good, again just explaining more about why it is important on top of what it does could be good.

I like the amount of sources that you have and that they are from various different studies, etc. The links work, so that's great too haha.

Organization: I like the amount of detail that you go into, and all that you explain about the behavior of mutansucrase. At times it does seem "choppy", like the topics presented in the same subheading don't seem very closely related. You could separate some of the longer sections into further subsections to further group similar things together and separate them from other topics that may all combine to become confusing.

Idk if a picture of mutansucrase or its function is possible at all, but those are always nice.

Overall, it is a very good article on mutansucrase I feel. Good work, and just try and keep similar topics together to simplify things.