User:Andrew ferdetta/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Techno-progressivism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article caught my attention since it is related to the class yet interesting

Evaluate the article
So far this article is decently written with a good starter. It describes it's major points and sections but in not much detail. As for it's content, the article is slightly dated and needs some work. While it is relevant to the topic, the details are weak and likely not 100% accurate. I am unable to tell if the article deals with Wikipedia's equity gaps. When it comes to tone and balance, the article does well and does not lean in one direction or the other and focuses on the facts. The Minority viewpoint seems to be mentioned in it's own section. Sources in this article are a problem, with many missing and some links pointing to nowhere. The sources that do work seem to be reliable for the most part but there needs to be more. When it comes to the article's organisation it is mostly well written and easy to read. It does not seem to have any grammatical errors. The only image in the article is the Transhumanism logo. There are no other images besides that. As for the talk page, it is very dated and not much as been going on. This article is a part of many WikiProjects including WikiProject Science, WikiProject Technology, WikiProject Politics, and WikiProject Transhumanism. Overall, the article is very defunct and needs work. It's main strength is that it has the main ideas and for the major weakness it is very shallow and lacks detail. The article can be best improved by having more detail and better sources.