User:Andrewanthony15/Language and gender/Vanessaamartinez Peer Review

General info
Andrewanthony15
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Andrewanthony15/Language and gender
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Language and gender

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * *The questions are derived from the "Peer review checklist" on the Peer Review assignment.*
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything that was written was relevant to the topic, and there was no information that distracted from the main point.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The draft remains neutral, simply recounting the views of anthropologist Deborah Tannen, without any bias.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * It was mentioned that the work of Deborah Tannen was inspired by Robanne Lakoff, so I think it would be a good idea to expand on Lakoff's work as well.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The references included don't seem to have functional links, however the sources themselves are relevant to the draft
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The sources appear to be reliable and neutral. The citations are not embedded within the text, but could easily be fixed.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * The information appears to be up to date. Overall, I think this draft would be a great inclusion to the article "Language and gender," but there is room for expansion on Robanne Lakoff's views.