User:Andrewsaillant/Squat lobster/Jenna.ham2 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Julievu2001


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Squat lobster


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Squat lobster

Evaluate the drafted changes
The information added is not included in the Lead seciton of the page, but rightfully so -- it is specific enough that it is unnecessary to include in the overview of the species. The content added is up-to-date, being cited from a very recent (2020) article and is relevant to the squat lobster topic, describing their embryonic development in detail and added to the appropriate section. There does not appear to be missing information, and there are no signs of inherent bias in the tone of the section added. This section is not meant to be persuading the reader one way or the other. The information is cited from a reputable source (research paper) that likely encompasses the whole of the details included in the edits. Is is given in an easily-understood way, explaining each of the stages of development in chronological order. There is one sentence, however, that seems a bit confusing - "...consists of five distinct stages in which the lasts several months" is worded a bit confusingly here. I am able to infer what is meant by this but I think a tweak in the phrasing would make it a bit more straightforward.