User:Andy yutong Zhou/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article:
 * WikiProject University of MassachusettsAndy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I choose this article to evaluate just because I am curious how Wikipedia describe Umass.Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead was quite short just describe this is a Wiki Project use to improve the Wikipedia for Umass. And there was a content table describe what will be contain in this article. The lead was quite concise just few sentences. Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
The content relevant to the topic. The content described what will be in the article such as scope of this article and templates they will use to make the Wikipedia for Umass.Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is very neutral. Because this is a WikiProject all the content is cited from WikiProject United States, WikiProject Massachusetts, and WikiProject Universities. Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
This is a WikiProject and all the information in this article seems like not finished yet. There were only few texts their and don't have any references at the end of the article. Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
This is a WikiPorject, however the article was not so organized. Some of the content just post so link their and I clicked them that was empty. This was a unfinished article and need to add more content or description of this project.Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
For image this project do really well. Some map of Massachusetts help us know where is the Umass and some logo of Umass there. All images adhere the copyrights and some of the pictures was they made it as first hand.Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
There were tons of information in talk page. Information they was they blueprint for their Umass Wikiproject as well as conversation of which parts they edited, Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
Overall this article is good present of what the format of a WikiProject looks like. However, the content there was so few or may need to describe more about what method they are using or what their main goal overall. Andy yutong Zhou (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: