User:Anemic Walrus/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Caroline Champetier

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it relates directly to our class project– editing an article of a female filmmaker that requires additional information.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is has a well-written and concise opening section, but includes information that is not included in the rest of the article. This is because the article only includes an incomplete list of films where the subject acted as a cinematographer or a director. While the lead mentions the subject's presidency at the French Society of Cinematographers and her family, the rest of the article does not.

The article's content leaves much to be desired, as its entire emphasis is on selected filmography. This is a problem, given it is an article about an under-represented group (non-anglophone female filmmakers) However, the information used is up-to-date and relevant.

The article has a neutral tone and is unbiased. However, the sources used could be improved, even by just using the sources in the French language article. The image could also be improved-- although it is copyright compliant, it is blurry and does not enhance the understanding of the project.

Although the article is part of four WIki Projects, it is considered a stub on all of them, and of low-importance to the "Female Writers" project.

In all, the article is a good starting point, but its use of only four sources limits its scope. Adding a "Career" section that discusses her education, career and professional achievements would add to the article. Adding a "Personal Life" section would also help, since the lead discusses her child.

Feedback
Good work! Chronophoto (talk) 17:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)