User:AngelOffley/Mindfulness-based stress reduction/Michellevp16 Peer Review

General info
AngelOffley
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AngelOffley/Mindfulness-based stress reduction
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Mindfulness-based stress reduction

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Overall, the lead is clear, concise, and informative. The lead allows the reader to get a good, broad understanding of the topic. The proposed changes would greatly benefit the readers understanding especially since the change is from the first sentence. The first sentence of every Wiki article is essential.

Content and Source/References

As to the content of the article, the article is clearly well structured. The article does seem up to date. The section, "evaluation of effectiveness", is clearly up to date and well structured. Nonetheless, I would recommend looking into any current information. As long as it is reliable and relevant, the information would benefit the section.

Tone and Balance

Overall, the article is neutral. The articles claims do not appear biased. Additionally, the article does not have a particular viewpoint. The content of the article provides the reader with a neutral stand point.

Organization

As previously mentioned, the article is well structured and clearly presented. I do not see any major grammar or spelling issues. Nonetheless, I would recommend looking in more detail.

Images and Media

Although images are not essential, I believe this article could possible benefit from more images.