User:Angel Miranda 24/Alano Edzerza/Gtaguines Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? AngelMiranda24
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Angel Miranda 24/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No, they do not have one.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes, the author has drops a quote in the middle of the career section.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, they present the information in the third person perspective.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? No, the author concisely provides the data about his career and personal life, but still needs the personal life section.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the author remains neutral with the presented information.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Each source provided is provided with secondary and reliable info, but not every piece of information is cited correctly. The author fails to provide a citation for information in each section, specifically the last couple of sentences.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The essay flows, but there are many grammar errors, especially the early life portion 2-3 sentences in.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes there are many. For example, "People in that group are known for Tattos The tatto design"
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the author does a great job of dividing each section out for their material.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, the author provides links to the artist's artwork.
 * Are images well-captioned? n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? No, there are only nine references, granted they are still working on the article.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, but the author provides links to the artwork only.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? n/a
 * What are the strengths of the content added? n/a
 * How can the content added be improved? n/a