User:Angela432/Evaluate an Article

Fertility Tourism

Most of the information is relevant to the topic. However, in the section on "Donor Insemination", the sentence "Anecdotal evidence suggests that the inventory of taller men who are blonde and blue eyed is most popular" goes somewhat off topic. Because the claim is vague and not well cited, it seems out of place in the article. Some of the statistics used, such as the number of fertility clinics in India and the amount of babies born to foreign parents, are out of date by a few years. New legislature regarding surrogacy can be added for specific countries such as Australia. The article organized the information under 3 types of procedures: in vitro fertilization, donor insemination, and surrogacy. More information about the procedures themselves and their corresponding risks, costs, and benefits could be added to the article. The article appears neutral, neither attacking nor defending fertility tourism. The section on surrogacy laws spans multiple paragraphs and is overrepresented compared to the section on IVF laws, which spans only a sentence, resulting in an imbalance of information. The citation links that are there do work and support the claims in the article, but not every claims is referenced with a reliable reference. The article is rated "Start-class" on the quality scale and "Mid-Importance" as part of the Wikiproject Medicine project scale. It is also part of the Wikiproject Travel and Tourism.