User:Angela Apple/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Womanism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Black women are discriminated for both their race and gender. This is an important aspect of the civil rights movement. This article seems to already have a lot of information written on it.

Evaluate the article

 * The lead section is concise, but I would include that womanism differs from feminism
 * I don't see the lead include a brief description of the article's major section
 * The lead does not include information that is not present in the article
 * The lead is concise
 * the article's content is relevant to the topic
 * The content is up-to-date
 * There seems to be no content that is missing or content that does not belong
 * The second paragraph under "Womanist identity" is a bit hard to read
 * You could argue that it is biased because of words used such as "mainstream" when describing feminism
 * Article is not biased, it just states information
 * "Purple is to Lavender" is not in quotations
 * Talk page discussion
 * Some parts are not clear. The sentence "Purple is to Lavender explores the concept that womanism is to feminism as purple is to lavender, that feminism falls under the umbrella of womanism." could be more than one sentence.
 * Links work
 * Images should be larger
 * Image caption does not say where it is from
 * Discussions say this article is incomplete, it does not explain womanism's link to African American women to it's full extent
 * Overall, the article can use some more information
 * The article is well organized
 * It can be improved by making the information more clear and neutral
 * The article is overall well-developed