User:Angelacgeorge/Loving Her/Claudiagclark Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Angelacgeorge
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Angelacgeorge/Loving Her

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes, in the contents but not in the body of the lead
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Lead evaluation
The lead is factual and to the point

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? could be some missing

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes good plot summary
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? just the book so far
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? just book
 * Are the sources current? book
 * Check a few links. Do they work? book

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes, easy to read and concise
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? none that I see
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? plot summary, characters so far

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no images
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * just plot summary and character list using the book so far
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * no sources
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * follows similar pattern of a novel wiki page
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * no

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * the plot summary is concise and explains the plot neutrally
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The plot summary
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * the sentence "the novel is recounted in Renay's recounting of events"
 * "impregnating her with a child"
 * "concerned residents" unsure if you can quote the book put in own words
 * "harsh bouts of discrimination in her new life, with the discrimination of the apartment building manager being one of many" might be unnecessary b/c of next sentence.
 * " assuming the stereotypical roles of husband and wife, respectively, and a nuclear family" might be verging on analysis