User:Angelajhyb/Chaetomium perlucidum/Xiyulu Peer Review

Hello,

I have some suggestions relating to the structure.

1.	The headings are not very clearly distributed. For example, you created one main heading, which is your species name, and then put some points that you are going to develop into the introduction of your final article. However, the introduction of a Wikipedia article is always on the very top of the wiki page without any headings. The main headings should be the subheadings that you created now, such as history, morphology and pathogenicity. I know that Wikipedia articles are edited as codes so it does take some time to get familiar with. If you have problems with putting the introduction on the very top without headings, I suggest you take a look at the articles that the professor posted under WEEK 3 – “Outlining your article” - Read several of the following Wikipedia articles: Apophysomyces variabilis, Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus versicolor, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Chrysosporium keratinophilum, Malassezia pachydermatis, Microsporum audouinii, Paecilomyces variotii, Microsporum gypseum, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Scedosporium prolificans.

Open one of those, then click “Edit” to see the correct format for coding the introduction (and of course without changing anything :)).

2.	The headings that you have right now are not very consistent and clear. For example, “In farming soil and crops” is too detailed compared to “History” and “Morphology” It might be better if you can change it to “Habitat”.

3.	Some points from the introduction, such as “Neurotropic[4] dematiaceous (melanated cell wall)[5] phaeoid ascomycete[4] that is naturally found in the soil[6], including in agricultural soil[7], and in the stems of dead plants[8] that is able to also thrive in higher temperatures of 35° and 42° C[4]” can be moved to the subsections “Habitat”, since the introduction is suppose to be the summary and information contains details could be presented later. Also, it might be better to divide transmission and susceptibility into an independent heading so its easier for readers to locate information.

I noticed that there is not much historical information relate to your species so great work on exploring morphology and pathogenicity.

Xiyulu (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)