User:Angelina3000/Social Network Theory/RamirezAlejandro305 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Angelina3000


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Social Network Theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

I believe that this article is off to a good start, the introduction summary of the article elaborates on the theory in fine detail.

Content

The content provided is relative to Social Network Theory, and is fairly up to date, with the earliest piece of information was sourced from 2010.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the article thus far has a very formal and factual context to it, there seems to be no evidence of biased or persuasion.

Sources and References

The sources provided are fairly up to date, with most of them featuring functional links that lead to scholarly websites.

Organization

The article is legible and well-organized with the information on top of the page and the source information below.

Images and Media

This article lacks any visual examples.