User:Angelinasutton/Study skills/Saifk72 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Angelinasutton)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Study skills
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead presented in the article both introduces the topic and includes its major sections. It is concise and provides an introduction without overly explaining it. The content added is relevant and up to date. The topic does not deal with wikipedia's equity gaps. It is a very niche topic. The content added appears to be neutral and there doesn't seem to be any bias or opinionated sentences present. There aren't any sentences that try to persuade the reader to lean towards a side. It is very neutral and informative, addressing the different viewpoints. There are a multitude of sources, some more recent than the others. They are thorough and informative. The sources appear to be peer reviewed and trustworthy, coming from credible places. The are a diverse spectrum of authors but no historically marginalized individuals. The links to these sources do work. The content was very easy to read and understand. There were little to no grammatical or structural problems. It was a well organized and informative article.