User:Angiesyz/Reproductive justice/ArlenSanchez Peer Review

Hi Angie!

I just read through your additions for the Reproductive Justice article and really like how you are trying to expand on the states role of reproductive justice along with adding why this is - considering various countering views on contraceptives across different cultures and ideologies.

Like the last article, you added to - you use very good neutral language that all the while still establishes the point you're trying to make.

For the first part of your paragraph where you write on the differences between republican and democratic administrations - I don't think it would hurt to explicitly mention the overturning of Roe V. Wade and the role either or both Trumps/and Biden administrations had in that.

When you expand on different stigmas towards contraceptive use - you do a great job of not mentioning any specific ideologies and beliefs which I think is great as it keeps it very respectful and neutral

Your sources look good.

Great work!

- Arlen

General info
(Angiesyz)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Angiesyz/Reproductive justice:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reproductive justice:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)