User:AngstyArmadillo/Coos Bay/Stellingkm Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AngstyArmadillo, Carsonwilliams, Foraminiferaa,  Chrisgre


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AngstyArmadillo/Coos Bay


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Coos Bay

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall this is looking really great! The edits/additions to the article lead pull it together really nicely and tie up the unmentioned material that was left in the original version. It's a good overview of the article and covers an appropriate amount of detail. The organization looks great to me too - the geography section might be a bit more expanded than it needs to be (the number of sections seems a bit ambitious :) ) so I think you could combine some of them together if you need to in later versions. It seems like some of this is still a work in progress, but other than that, the content seems up to date and relevant. Content is also neutral and unbiased. Sources seem current and reliable, but make sure to add in the appropriate wikipedia article links for topics that are mentioned. Content is concise and clear - but be careful with run-on sentences and capitalization (i.e. "Bay" in the intro paragraph and "Nitrogen" at the end of the Nitrogen section). Coos Bay seems like it has the potential for some really fun images - you could add in some really cool ones of local fauna or more from the shipping port! Definitely keep the 1890 one from the building of the jetty - it's so cool!

Great job - I'm excited to read this again when it's all pulled together!