User:Anguyen3927/sandbox

Pathos in research

Pathos can also be also used in credited medical journals, research and other academic pieces of writing. The goal is to appeal to the readers' emotion while maintaining the necessary requirements of the medical discourse community. Authors may do so, by using certain vocabulary to elicit an emotional response from the audience. “God-terms” are often used as a rhetorical technique. It is imperative that authors still preserve the standard of writing within the medical community by focusing on factual and scientific information without use of personal opinion.

Does this fit on the page and is useful information? I would also like some feedback on the lack of pathos that should be used?

Gusfield, Joseph. "The literary rhetoric of science: Comedy and pathos in drinking driver research." American sociological review (1976): 16-34.

of presenting ideas and data is to enable the audience to see the external world as it is. (17) persuade the audience that the results of the research are not literature, are not a product of the style of presentation. The style of non- style is itself the style of science. (17) tion entails both an assertive, descriptive level and an aesthetic, artistic level then the win- dowpane is never completely clear; there is always a streak of stained glass to capture our imagination and wonder. (17) In this sense the flow, or action, of the paper is dramatic. (19) That the author means to persuade his audience of certain conclusions is both evi- dent and explicit. The importance of method substantiates the overall style of detachment. He means to persuade, but only by presenting an external world to the audience and allow- ing that external reality to do the persuading. Thus the language must be emptied of feeling and emotion. The tone must be clinical, de- tached, depersonalized. His language must not be "interesting," his descriptions colorful or This content downloaded from 96.230.29.176 on Tue, 08 Oct 2019 02:33:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms LITERARY RHETORIC OF SCIENCE 21 his words a clue to any emotion which might be aroused in the audience. (21)
 * The aim
 * The writer must
 * If all communica-

Edlund, John R. "Ethos, logos, pathos: Three ways to persuade." Retrieved on 29 (2014).
 * in terms of what Aristotle called ethos, the way in which the rhetor is perceived by the audience (285)
 * the writer on the other hand is severely limited in the ethical appeals he or she can offer....tone word choice and sentence structure are important in establishing an implied authorial character. (285)
 * the production of a piece of writing product...so king George can read it are representative of a more binding vow than speech can make. (286)

Connors, Robert J. "The Differences between Speech and Writing: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos." College Composition and Communication 30.3 (1979): 285-290. Web. "Gendering Pathos on the Early Modern Stage: Persuasion and Passion in John Webster’s The White Devil and The Duchess of Malfi." Interdisciplinary Literary Studies17.1 (2015): 19-38. Web.
 * A White Devil and The Duchess of Malfi reveal unexpected trajectories of passionate appeal and persuasive effect, particularly in the ways female rhetors undercut early modern rhetorical advice regarding the deployment of pathos.
 * Throughout On Rhetoric, Aristotle prescribes passionate appeal as a means to alter the judgment of one's audience. Emotions affect perception: “The emotions are those things through which, by undergoing change, people come to differ in their judgments and which are accompanied by pain and pleasure, for example, anger, pity, fear, and other such things and their opposites” (121). As described in Jason Wisse's Ethos and Pathos,
 * Pathos is the merging of reason and emotion in order to generate persuasive empathy. Yet if emotional appeals are inflected by the gender of the rhetor, “ingrained evaluations” tend to short-circuit the male audience's ability to imagine likeness to, or experience understanding for, the female rhetor. The plays reveal a strained relationship between the female rhetor's emotion and her audience's interpretation.
 * Early modern rhetorical theory conceptualizes pathos as a result of shared consensus held by audience and orator.