User:Anjsan01/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Astronomy and Spirituality


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * The article does not have an introductory sentence that describes the article topic clearly
 * Does not include a descriptions of the main sections
 * The lead is very concise and does not have many details
 * Content
 * The content is relevant to the topic
 * The content is up to date and was last edited in 2021
 * These is a lot of content missing about astronomy and/or spirituality and how they relate
 * The article does not deal with equity gaps or relate to historically underrepresented populations or topics
 * Tone and Balance
 * The article is neutral
 * There are no claims that appear to be heavily biased towards a particular position
 * No viewpoints are overrepresented or underrepresented
 * The article does not use any persuasion
 * Sources and References
 * The information is backed up by secondary sources of information
 * The sources are thorough and current (2001 and 2019)
 * The sources reflect gender diversity
 * There are better sourced available that can provide more detail on the topic
 * The links do work
 * Organization and Writing Quality
 * The article only has a lead and it is not written very well, it does not give any introduction into the topic
 * Does not have any grammatical or spelling errors
 * The article is not organized in any specific way
 * Images and Media
 * The article does not have any images
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * There are no conversations going on
 * The article is rates stub-class, low importance
 * It is part of WikiProject Astronomy/Astronomical objects, Psychology, Spirituality, and Spaceflight
 * Overall Impression
 * The article is a stub, and it has very minimal content
 * Strengths: There is a lot of freedom with what to add
 * The article needs more content
 * It is very underdeveloped
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Milk Frother
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * Includes an introductory sentence that describes the article topic concisely and clearly
 * Includes a brief description of the major sections
 * It does include information that is not yet present in the article
 * Lead is concise and not overly detailed
 * Content
 * Content is relevant to the topic
 * The content is up to date
 * There is missing content
 * The article does not deal with any equity gaps or relate to historically underrepresented populations or topics
 * Tone and Balance
 * The article is neutral
 * No biased positions
 * No viewpoints are overrepresented, or underrepresented
 * No attempts to persuade readers in favor of one position or away from another
 * Sources and References
 * All facts are backed up by a reliable secondary source
 * All sources are thorough
 * All sources are current
 * Sources are not written by a diverse spectrum of authors
 * There are better sources available that can provide more detail on the topic
 * The links do work
 * Organization and Writing Quality
 * The article is well written
 * There are no grammatical or spelling errors
 * The article is well-organized
 * Images and Media
 * The article does include images that enhance the understanding of the topic
 * The images are well-captioned
 * All images adhere to copyright regulations
 * Images could be laid out in a more visually appealing way
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * There are no conversations going on behind the scenes
 * The article is rated Stub-class, Low importance and is part of WikiProject Food and Drink
 * Overall Impression
 * The article could use more information but is laid out with a good foundation
 * Strengths: Has clear sections and is easy to build off
 * The article can use more information and detail in the sections that are already created
 * The article is underdeveloped, but has a lot of potential
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * University of Washington College of Arts and Sciences
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * Includes an introductory sentence that describes the article topic concisely and clearly
 * Does not include a brief description of the major sections
 * It does not include information that is not yet present in the article
 * Lead is concise and not overly detailed
 * Content
 * Content is relevant to the topic
 * The content is up to date
 * There is missing content
 * The article does not deal with any equity gaps or relate to historically underrepresented populations or topics
 * Tone and Balance
 * The article is neutral
 * No biased positions
 * No viewpoints are overrepresented, or underrepresented
 * No attempts to persuade readers in favor of one position or away from another
 * Sources and References
 * All facts are backed up by a reliable secondary source
 * All sources are thorough
 * All sources are current
 * Sources are not written by a diverse spectrum of authors
 * The links do work
 * Organization and Writing Quality
 * The article is well written
 * There are no grammatical or spelling errors
 * The article can be organized better
 * Images and Media
 * The article does include images but it does not enhance the understanding of the topic
 * The images are well-captioned
 * All images adhere to copyright regulations
 * Images could be laid out in a more visually appealing way
 * More images can be added
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * There are no conversations going on behind the scenes
 * The article is rated Stub-class, Low importance and is part of WikiProject United States, Washington, Washington - Seattle, Higher Education
 * Overall Impression
 * The article could use more information but is laid out with a good foundation
 * Strengths: Has clear sections and more information can be easily added
 * The article can use more information and detail in the sections that are already created
 * The article is underdeveloped, but has a lot of potential
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources