User:Anjsan01/Milk frother/Graceyi11 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Anjsan01


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anjsan01/Milk_frother/Graceyi11_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

I thought the lead was good, by looking at your draft I'm not sure if you made any changes but maybe you can add more information about what you added to this article. Maybe, slightly mention a sentence or few to indicate what the article will talk about if that makes sense.

Content:

The content was very good and well written. I thought it was smart to add information about the different types of milk because there definitely are milks that froth better than others.

Tone and Balance:

The tone and balance was good because it was very neutral. There didn't seem to be any biases or overrepresented/underrepresented content. The balance of the content was good.

Sources and References:

At first glance, you seem to have many references that you used which is awesome!

Organization:

Again, the content was concise, well-written, and broken down into sections which was easier to read through.

Images and Media:

Maybe you can add images of like the different kinds of milks being frothed or the comparison just to up the article game. The visual of the plunger type of frother was not the best in my opinion, I think you can definitely find an image that uses the metal to get a better idea.

Overall Impressions:

Overall, I thought that you did a good job on adding additional information to the article. Specifically, because you focused on the different types of milk and how that affects the frothiness of the milk. I also thought it was great that you added more details of how the milk becomes frothy. My first impression was that it was short, simple but enough information that I wanted to know about a frother.