User:Ankiiaj/Urban Rivers/Fabdi3 Peer Review

The article explains how the organization is structured. I like how they broke down the history for us, as well as explaining partnerships and updating us on what is happening now with the organization.

Something else that I liked is that they have a pretty good amount of information.

Some changes I would suggest to improve the article.

Some improvement that I would suggest is to reread the writing, I feel like some details are too much.

For example I changed “ The Chicago Urban Rivers Project is a take on an environmental initiative that is aims at restoring the waterways that are in..”, to, “ The Chicago Urban Rivers Project is an environmental initiative that aims to restore the waterways in Chicago..”

Just rephrasing certain sentences, I feel like on the Partnership part, writers could have just included main organizations that make a change to help the Chicago Urban Rivers. Also, double check how some things are wordy, reading it out loud makes one stop and rethink what they wrote if it sounds odd.

Fabd3

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * ankiiaj


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)