User:Annadubon/Human right to water and sanitation/Snoops292 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? annadubon
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Annadubon/Human right to water and sanitation

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
Great content. Very relevant and informative on the topic. no suggestions here

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
Your claim seems to be in favor of privatization, which lines up with your source. There is the possibility of adding information on the other side - finding an article as to why government supervision could be more efficient in some cases. Also if you have the time, giving examples could be helpful to back up your claims with concrete examples:).

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The source is relevant, reliable, and works. Maybe add in that citation for the sentence before too.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
Very well-written - you're a great writer! No grammar or spelling suggestions.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
n/a

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Great job! Concise, well-written and informative. It does seem a bit biased so if you could provide info on the other side that could be useful (it could already be in the existing article I'm not sure). But overall looks rly great :))