User:Annakhl/Threetooth puffer/Msiscar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(annakhl, gnbuss12)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Threetooth puffer - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * It does not exist

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall impressions: The content that you have is good but it is a tad short. Try and add some more sources in order to give your article even more depth and make it more fleshed out.

Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? While the Lead has been updated with new information, it is short and can use some more information that distinguishes it from the previous stub. It would be a good idea for you to find some sources that have info that correlates with the lead that you already wrote.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, all the content relates to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Some of the content is but some of the content is from more than a few years back. You may want to verify that the information you use from your 2005, 2008, and 2011 sources still hold up today.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is no content that doesn't belong and I don't think that any content is missing.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes. all the content added is neutral.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, none of the content is trying to persuade the reader.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all of the new content is cited and has hyperlinks and I think everything is properly formatted as well.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content is clear, concise, and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? It does not have either.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the content is well organized.

Images and Media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, the article has multiple images that enhance the understanding of the topic