User:Anniep256/WALL-E/Makayla Stanley Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Mason Lamb and Annie Palmucci)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mglamb/sandbox?


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * WALL-E

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead and introductory paragraph was very detailed and reflected the content that is present in the article. The organization for this piece is exceptional and well-written. The lead provides a brief description of the article's major sections. The authors wrote in a non-biased tone and provided factual information. Although, this information was not backed up by any sources. A reference list is not present. The content within the piece is relevant to the movie but not much information is mentioned concerning the topic of ecology. Authors can compare the interspecies relationships in animals (mutualism...) to that of the interactions and relationships between the robots. Authors can write about if the movie contained any anthropomorphic scenes which would not be seen in human nature. The authors mentioned that the film portrays real life matter such as corporations invading society with their footprint, health and nutrition struggles, human pollution, trash and recycling oversight, and risk of global devastation. These matters were not explained and examples were not given from the film (evidence). In the film valuable information is with held from the public, the authors can write on how this information was not publicized and only people in command or power knew about it. The writers compared the film animation of "Finding Nemo" to "Wall-E". They can also compare the anthropomorphic scenes of "finding Nemo" to the scenes in "Wall-E".

The content added is relevant, and there are no spelling or grammatical errors within the piece. The content reflects the major points in the article and only a few points are underrepresented. The absence of a reference list or sources does not indicate whether are credible and factual. Sources provide a reader with evidence that this information is not biased or seen from one's personal perspective. This also allows a reader to know how current this information is and if it should be seen as appropriate for this article. Providing sources adheres to wikipedia's copyright regulations and allow a writer to not be penalized for plagiarism. A credible source can be found in scholarly articles and journals which have been peer-reviewed. Some images may be added to enhance the piece, following Wikipedia's copyright regulations. Wall-E was the first movie where Pixar included live-action animation. The characters and live-action animation can be compared with other live-action animation films created by Pixar. The similarities and differences of the films can be examined and how it affected the public audience: children and family. The control given to AUTO in the film can be discussed to see how the robot showed somewhat of feelings toward the idea of written to earth. The co-operation of humans and robots to secure the plant can be seen as a mutualistic relationship between the characters.

The content in this draft complete the article, but some information on the ecological aspects of the film can be added. The interaction between the humans and the robots can be observed to see if any anthropomorphism is present, such as affection toward a robot or machines. How humans react to these non-living objects. The overal piece was once again very organized and detailed in informing the reader of what is present in the article and what topics will be addressed.