User:Annsli.Hilton/Marine habitats/Mmurdockgcsu Peer Review

What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
Each section is clear and informational.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
I would try to find images for the "Sea Floor" and "Mudflats" sections. It would help give a picture of what microplastic pollution or mudflats look like.

Did you notice anything about the article that could be applicable to your own article?
Not really, my article talks about invasive species in Canada. If they had mentioned invasive species in mudflats in relation to plastic pollution, it may connect then (not stating to add this, just and idea for the question).

Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order?
Yes, these section are well organized and they flow well.

Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out missing?
Yes, more information can always be added. The amount they have though is fine as is.

Does the article draw out conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular view point?
No, the article is very informational with no bias. It stresses the effects of plastic pollution in Earth's oceans very well.

Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people?
It does not make any claims in that manner.

Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source?
Yes, there is a sufficient number of sources for the article (3 per person was provided).

Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources?
No, they have a good variety of reliable sources.

Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references?
No, all sources were listed.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)